Episode 2.15: And Now for a Word

I wish I liked the episode more. I was excited about it after reading the description, because it’s a clever concept, and then in practice the dialogue and the acting was all great. The story they’re telling is cool, and they tell it well, and by all accounts I should like it, but.... It didn’t work for me.  And I think I know why.

The gimmick is this: A Narn ship and a Centauri ship get into a fight, prompting an increasingly hostile series of escalations between the Narn, the Centauri, and Earth, but instead of seeing this unfold like normal we see it through the lens of a TV news program who happened to be on the station filming when the attack occurred. This is a cool idea, and it was fun to watch, but it had two problems: first of all, the news show created an extra layer between the audience and the story, which separates us from the drama and leaves the whole thing feeling kind of clinical and lifeless. There’s a scene in the diplomatic council chamber where Sheridan and all the ambassadors are yelling at each other, and it absolutely crackles with energy, and I thought “wow this got really good all of a sudden” and then I realized that it was because the extra layer had disappeared. Something dramatic was happening, and we actually got to watch it; most of the rest of the episode felt like the newscaster was  describing a bunch of drama to us instead of just letting us experience it for ourselves.

The second problem is related: a frame story like this can totally work, distanced drama and all, but only if it replaces the drama with something else—some extra level of commentary or irony. This episode flirted with that idea a couple of times, but it never really went all in. In practice, this meant that the newscaster frame story never really mattered—it never rose beyond “a clever idea” to become “the best and only way this story could have been told.” If you’re going to take something away (the immediacy and direct connection to the story) you have to add something else back. Otherwise all you have is a hollow gimmick.

There were two times that the episode really uses its form to do something it couldn’t have done otherwise, and they (along with the scene in the council chamber) were absolutely the highlights. One of them came in the newscaster’s interview with Delenn: the reporter talked to all of the ambassadors in turn, getting their opinions on the station and on the attack, and it was fun to see their different attitudes contrasted against each other. This was a common trope in season one, and I loved it and I’m bad they did it again. But then they elevated it to a whole new level with Delenn, because as her interview wore on you started to realize that the reporter was a blatant anti-Minbari racist, and that bit by bit she was dropping her facade of professionalism to just start attacking Delenn directly. It was brutal, and it was uncomfortable, and it told a good story while also feeding into the long-term mytharc of the series, and—this is the key—it couldn’t possibly have been done in any other format. The frame story with the reporter is what made the scene effective, especially in contrast to the other ambassadors who were treated with respect, while Delenn was just badgered until she cried (and then the camera lingered on her crying FAR longer than necessary, which was perfect).

The other moment came in the form of a fake commercial for Psi-Corps recruitment: a little boy is sad because the other kids pick him on for “knowing things” he shouldn’t know, and then a Psi-Corps guy shows up and tells little Johnny and his Mom all about how the Psi-Corps loves him for being different and special, and offers to pay for his education, and then slips in a subtle plea for everyone to inform on their neighbors if they think someone might be telepathic. It walked that perfect 1950s line between adorably homey and creepily dystopian, and—again—it couldn’t possible have worked without the frame story to make it fit.

If the episode had featured more fake commercials, maybe even one per break, it could have helped ground us in the world and shown us all kinds of things we’ve never seen before, from other perspectives we don’t usually get on the show. And/or, if the episode had focused on the Minbari instead of the Narn/Centauri war, we could have gotten a lot more of that racist editorializing we had with Delenn, which would have given us a stronger emotional connection to the newscaster, who was functioning as the main character. Instead, she was mostly a blank, and the other characters were filtered through a separating lens, and I feel like someone told me about a good story instead of just telling me the good story. Ultimately, the episode was a fantastic idea on paper that never came together as an episode; it was good, and it contained some absolutely brilliant stuff, but as a whole I think the experiment failed. I would love to see that whole story again from the other side, living it along with the characters like normal. Probably with G'Kar or Londo as the focus character, because there is some awesome character work going on there if the show will get out of its own way and let us see it.

(I especially loved the way they were portrayed: Londo as cool and reasonable but also removed and kind of disingenuous; G'Kar as hot-headed and angry, but also a man of the people. And after last episode's stumble, Kosh is actually cool again: his one appearance shows the news crew trying and failing to get an interview with him, barely managing to catch a glimpse before a door slammed shut. Cool stuff.)

Comments

  1. One thing about this episode that I think damages it is how "90s" it is. The way the news is presented is very 20/20 or Dateline.

    The entire thing is very in the style of the way these "news specials" were done in the mid-90s. That obviously isn't how journalism has really developed since then.

    That's obviously not something you can really fault B5 for since he was writing based on what he knew at the time. But i do think it detracts from the episode when watching with the knowledge of how journalism has developed since then

    ReplyDelete
  2. This episode has always been one of my favorites because it so perfectly nails the 20/20 of the 80's and 90's vibe. I agree, it would have been great to have more than the one commercial spot, but I feel like this is one of f JMS' riffs on media distortion of reality and in some ways is all to applicable today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And blogspot won't let me edit my own comment to remove the typo I saw two seconds after hitting publish. :(

      Delete
  3. I think your analysis is pretty spot on. I remember really liking this episode at the time, but it's also one that doesn't hold up as well for a number of reasons. They use this frame again at some point with much greater effect (at least I think).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good analysis. The main point of this episode is showcasing the dissonance between the values Babylon 5 was created for, and the opinions of people back on Earth. B5 was built ten years after a brutal war that nearly destroyed humanity, and a lot of hatred towards the Mimbari, and distrust of aliens in general, remains common on Earth.

    You get part of this in season one, with the people who were convinced Sinclair was a traitor.

    Unfortunately, this episode did not do enough to showcase that core tension.

    Side note: Psi Corps ad includes a cute freeze frame subliminal message of their slogan: The Corps is Mother, The Corps is Father.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This episode also does some heavy lifting for a later episode allowing them to do the show part of show not tell much better than they would have without this one

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts